SAMANTHA W. DEDICATION
Alison "ALI" Gertz
Bubbles FromThe Heart!
PROFORMATIVE! 2 Examples
Proof of SYPHILIS, CAUSE!
SCHEDULE, for COMPLETION
Too Sweet Enterprises
Nuggets Of SCAM & COVERUP
No DBA RegistrationLEADER
SCOOP on Leaderspecialty!
Putting To Rest ALIASES
SCAM! Documents EXPLAINED
Is It a "Trick" or "Treat
The DISSOLVEMENT PROCESS
Bradham's 5 Laws!
Bradham's 1st Law
Bradham's 2nd Law
Bradham's 3rd Law
Bradham's 4th, 5th Laws
"Common Rule Of Law"
The P Sweetie Revolution!
The"Too Sweet" Trademark!
Home Of Book
New York Times 1988-91
AIDS Landscape, 1984
Doctor Of Divinity Degree
Attack on HIV Capability!
Proof Of Syphilis Connect
What Formed AIDS Disease?
Major Questions About HIV
Stating My Case!
Theorized, For Sure!
HIV Infection Rate!
Methodology Of Cure!
What's Lem Bradham About?
Tribute To The Coach!
16 Member Board Advisors
The Journey, Lem Bradham
Prep School/And Parents!
Prophecy Of My Teacher!
Table Of Contents
Too Sweet Enterprises/Bubbles From The Heart
Your Web Site's Slogan
A story which should have
been told many decades ago.
Please go to PAGE 1 of WEBSITE.
This is Page 41.
SAMANTHA W. Dedication is Page 1. (Top Of PAGE!)
( ALL MY EMAILS goes to this Address)!
A Very Important Announcement,
Ignored By Medical Researchers Around
I had a lot of suspicions when Luc Montagnier,
the original discoverer of HIV, presented himself
on television and announced that "his virus was
not the cause of AIDS"--- and got ignored by main-
stream medical researchers and the media alike.
This was a totally disrespectful action. But it
happened. And went unnoticed by most of the people
of the world. These moments happened around the late
1980's into the early 1990's. The (so-called) original
announcment that "HIV was the cause of AIDS" wasn't
made by the Frenchman Montagnier. But rather by
an American, on April 23, 1984.
It is my opinion that
"this is when things started to unravel."
The American's name, Dr. Robert Gallo, a medical
researcher at the NIH ( National Institute of
Health) located in Bethesda, Maryland. A hypothesis
was announced! And no one bothered to correct the
media. Thereby leading the public to believe that
"this sort of announcement was a proven fact,"
which it wasn't. Only a THEORY.
Again: No one bothered to correct the media.
"Mind-boggling," to say the least. So, I'll tell you
what we're going to do. We're going to tell you how
this thing got screwed up, and how we're going to
straighten this mess out. Because I firmly believe
that we have some extremely difficult times a-
head because of this mess. A "rush to judgment"
on HIV, which could be nothing more than a
"harmless passenger virus." These guys and girls,
men and women, haven't proven their case suf-
ficiently. And it has been almost 30 years!
Where's the proven medial evidence of HIV
causation? It's missing!
Everyone knows a little about " Doctor
This is what
I think of " Doctor So and So". And I
say this rather respectfully.
(The following passages):
You shouldn't care what "Doctor So ad So" says.
All we should be concerned about is what "Doctor
So and So" can prove in writing. "Proven
documentation," so that "Doctor So and So"
can be checked for accuracy, and believability.
Step by step documentation, which can be
repeated to observe "if other qua-
lified medical researchers can arrive
at the same conclusions."
Anything else could be just a lot of talk!
Show us the proof. You, me, the general public.
Because if "Doctor So and So" is wrong, we're
going to be the ones who suffer the most. The
infected ones of a disease called AIDS.
I, Lemuel Bradham, am not infected with the
disease of AIDS, or any other disease. I am
one of the lucky ones. But I surely share the
pain of the suffering.
No one's attempting to discredit "Doctor
So and So". But "Doctor So and So"
knows the rules of medical science.
The rules demand that "such steps be
taken before any such 'big announce-
ments of disease conditions'."
For whatever reasons, these steps were
evaded. "Kicked to the wind!" No such
scrutinization process was followed.
No such "check and balance" was
adhered. Such actions have to raise
many suspicions. And it has!
We have to work hard to correct the
flaws which could've taken place at
this time, the mid-1980's. My sus-
picions are that we will all suffer
from them for decades to come.
There's no justification in this type
of suffering, especially for the in-
fected people of the world. The
disease classification referred to
as AIDS should have us all won-
dering about the proper causa-
tive agent. In my opinion, HIV
falls way short of having the
ability to cause any disease, and
especially that of AIDS.
We're going to tell the "complete story" or as much
as we can. How this existence called HIV cannot be
located in many tests given to it, whereas other
microbes have been located quite easily. How HIV
has never been completely and properly isolated
which meets the "guidelines" of medical science.
And how, without "complete and proper" isolation
you have no idea of the makeup of HIV. In other-
words, you have no idea of what it does. But
surely can tell what it hasn't accomplished
through "proven medical documentation."
As far as we know, we could be chasing a ghost.
Something that we will never catch, ever.
And in the process " wasting
billions of billions of research dollars"
and "feeding infected individuals of
AIDS with a lot of unnecessary drugs.
Harmful drugs which can do
as much damage as AIDS itself."
Missing Syphilis Cases!
Around the first part of the 1980's, syphilis cases were on
a sharp decline. Many medical practitioners noticed the
trend. In big cities where cases of syphilis were drop-
ping abnormally, there were plenty of reasons for concern.
The sexual habits of people hasn't changed. The "bath
houses" were still around (maybe more of them). The
pimps and prostitutes were still in business in ever
increasing numbers. Yet, "Where was the syphilis?"
I, Lemuel Bradham, talked with many medical practi-
tioners who said the same thing, "Their cases of
syphilis seemed to have gone underground."
It's strange that they would say such a thing. Be-
cause I felt that that's just what syphilis did. WENT
During this time, and even before then, as early as a
decade or so before, flunctuations in syphilis cases
were visible. The "rise and fall" of these sort of
numbers always send concerned people, guessing.
During this time, it can easily be concluded that the
"disease of syphilis was making it conversion. Devel-
oping into something new which wasn't really new at
all." The disease of syphilis has been known to play
tricks like this forever. It is known as the "Great
Magician" showing its face as different diseases,
while effectively disguising itself---- while con-
cealing itself away from microscopic detection.
One of the deadliest diseases of our lifetime,
having this type of capability.
No one knows the origin of syphilis. The Haitians
had to get it from somewhere. We can only theo-
rize. Theories are only as good as the proof.
Something else happened during the first part
of the 1980's. Here comes a disease called AIDS
affecting mostly homosexuals, or so they say.
Next, comes the French with their version of HIV.
Then the Americans, with their claim to HIV---
just in time to fill the void left by the missing
cases of syphilis.
Amazing how this works!
No one ever answered the question, "about
the missing cases of syphilis." They were too
enthused by the prospects of a new disease,
and of course a new infectious agent, called
HIV----- which is just as confusing now, as
it was almost 30 years ago.
(Do you see the connection?)
The "missing cases" of syphilis has never really
and truly be accounted for, in terms of a "syphil-
is conversation." It was ignored! Forgotten. The
medical people were so carried away with the
prospects of a new disease (which wasn't really
new at all), and with a new causative agent,
(which for almost 30 years) hasn't been proven
to have the capability to kill cells. Especially
enough to be classified as a disease causer.
There isn't one piece of proven medical doc-
umentation which provides for the virus of
HIV to have the capability to directly kill
one blood cell. It is biochemically inept
when it comes to this type of ability. It
doesn't produce a poison during the time
of the AIDS disease. This is like having
a gun without bullets. There is no microbe
in the past, current, and/or future which
can cause a disease, by accident, every
single time. By just "stumbling over"
this type of retrovirus as such. Yet, this
is what the supporters of HIV want us
My question, "Where's the proven docu-
mentation to show cause, effect, and
result?" These certain conditions are a
requirement. Not an option!
The new disease of AIDS doesn't have a new
disease within its ranks. Every disease is an old
one, which has been treated previously. Kaposi
Sarcoma, a cancer was discovered by Moritz
Kaposi. Mr. Kaposi died in 1903.
The new part of the AIDS equation is the manner
inwhich the disease attacks individuals in arriving
one after another. To seem to be cured, but pops
right back up. They attack in groups, than by it-
self. It is, by far, a difficult and dangerous maneu-
ver by various disease states which results in
death. Newness is the manner inwhich these
diseases attack. Not the disease itself. The
diseases are old. They have been around for
Something has made diseases, which were
once curable, to become incurable. In our
researched opinion, with many "shots in the
dark, and hitting the target," it is syphilis
which influences the other diseases of the
AIDS classification to act in this manner. To
become incurable, which they once were.
The "bully" on the streets!
Take care of the "bully", get rid of the disease.
This HIV thing! I have no idea what they're
talking about. Causative agent! What causative
agent? We've observed nothing to the effect.
Where is the proven medical documentation to
show "cause and effect".
It is missing. And it has been almost 30 years!
Within AIDS disease, syphilis shows up in about
70 to 75 per cent of the cases. Yet it stands alone.
Let me repeat this: Within the disease of AIDS
syphilis shows up in about 70 to 75 per cent of the
cases, but is not considered a cause. It stands
It shows up either before the AIDS classification
is given, and shortly afterwards. Yet medical re-
searchers seem not to want to establish the link
between the two, or so it seems.
Many medical researchers in the country of Ger-
many were right on point when they said that
"Syphilis was AIDS." But their effort became
unglued when the announcement of HIV was
made. Became completely dismantled! Un-
If the world would have left those guys alone, we
might have a drug cure by now. What our org-
anization is working on, The Association, is a
"nondrug formula". And we are, ever so close.
(4 of them to be exact).
My book, Bubbles From The Heart Verdict: The
Conquest will examine avenues of AIDS disease
barely discussed and will take us on a journey re-
sulting into victory for all.
The journey will be "steep and difficult." The op-
position will be fierce! But we will prevail for the
good of all the people.
We all will rejoice in this accomplishment!
We have to... and we will!
Picture taken in Toronto, Ontario Canada
(across from the Blue Jay's
baseball stadium, Yonge Str
Beautiful setting, righ
t on the docks!
Georgia, George, (
Yours truly), and Grandma
Grandma was visiting from England
Yonge Street is the longest in the world
My friends actually lived 50 miles
of Toronto in a place called Courtice.
I spent 2 weeks with them, going to Niagra
Buffalo, New York, et....
Website: A Continuous Work In Progress!